Lucky Days turns up on plenty of lists of sister sites, and only one name on those lists survives a check of the paperwork: Spin Away. The same Kahnawake permit number sits in the footer of each, which leaves nothing to infer. What separates the pair is permissions rather than software. Lucky Days trades under two European permissions Spin Away does not. Those are what pay for pricing in SEK on its Swedish site, for entry through bank credentials with no form to fill in, for an app in both stores, and for a daily free spin with no wagering attached. The same brand prices in C$ for players in Ontario, in EUR for Ireland and the rest of its international traffic, and in ZAR on a rand site of its own.
Every check behind this page was made on 29 July 2026, and no account was registered at any of the three brands. Only what a visitor sees without logging in is reported here, dated to that pass.
The sister sites question, settled by one permit number
Claims of a shared owner usually rest on a shared template or a familiar-looking bonus. This one rests on a number both operators print themselves. Kahnawake permit 1041 appears in the footer of Lucky Days and in the footer of Spin Away, and the register carries a single holder for it. Nobody in the middle has to be believed. That is as close to documentary as this topic gets, and it is why every other name attached to this brand has to clear a higher bar than looking similar.
What is identical, rung for rung
In the markets both serve, the offers do not merely resemble each other. The EUR package is the same EUR 1000 with 100 free spins, broken on the same three rungs at the same percentages, released on the same schedule and running on the same headline slot. The ZAR package is the same R15,000, split the same way at R1,500, R3,000 and R10,500. Anyone who has cleared the welcome at one of these has already seen everything the other has to show a new account.
That matters more than it sounds. People switch to a sibling brand for one thing: a second welcome offer on software they already know. Here the software is familiar and the offer is the same offer, so the move buys you a new set of terms to agree to and very little else. Anyone working down a list of rooms in search of fresh bonus value should count this pair as a single entry rather than two.
What is not, and it all points one way
No European regulator has vetted the sister brand. It holds neither of the two European permissions behind this one, and everything that follows from them is missing with it: no route in through bank credentials anywhere on its site, no SEK pricing, no Nordic position at all. It publishes no app. It publishes no daily wheel. Put the two side by side and the sister comes up short on every one of those points.
One thing genuinely runs the other way. The sister’s terms set out ten currencies, a list that reaches from CAD and NZD as far as KRW, JPY and THB. That is a wider published spread than most single brands carry, and it stands as the one honest reason to pick the sister instead. What it cannot do is SEK, because the permission that would allow that belongs to this brand instead. There is also a counterparty difference on the same provincial register: this brand contracts through L7 Entertainment Limited there, the sister through NGame N.V., same regulator and same rules with a different name on your agreement.
The sister’s withdrawal ceilings are the other thing to know before choosing between them. They run 4,000 daily, 16,000 weekly and 50,000 monthly, in EUR or USD or the equivalent. The clause applies to active accounts, dormant ones and self-excluded players alike. Nothing equivalent is published on this brand’s public terms, which does not prove that no limit exists, only that the sister states one and this one does not.
The brand that is not a sister at all
The name that keeps getting padded into lists of Lucky Days sister sites is Casino Days, and the reason is a word rather than an argument. Rhino appears in the corporate paperwork behind both businesses, one page turned that into kinship, and the rest copied. The check takes a second: the pair print Kahnawake permit 1041 and Casino Days prints CPA 01054, a different number issued to a different company. Different registered addresses in Malta, different Curacao registrations, and a corporate group whose own brand list contains neither Lucky Days nor Spin Away. The evidence all runs one way and it is strong, though nothing short of Malta’s beneficial-ownership records could close the question absolutely, and those are not public.
Where it matters to a player: Casino Days runs a published VIP scheme with cashback to 20 per cent. It takes cryptocurrency openly alongside cards and bank transfer. It puts out properly localised sites with live chat in the local language rather than an English page with a flag on it. None of those three things exists on either brand in the pair. If that is what you came looking for, the brand you want is the one that is not related.
It is also built differently underneath. Its Norwegian traffic goes to a separate domain serving a full NOK site, where every other market is handled as a path on the main one. Its Finnish-language version runs on two Estonian permits from that country’s tax and customs board rather than on anything issued closer to home. There is no rand version anywhere on it, so on that one point the pair have something it does not. And it carries a dormancy clause the pair do not: leave the account idle for five straight months and the terms take a fee equal to the whole balance.
Rhino Entertainment Group agreed on 12 March 2026 to sell its Canada-licensed B2C business, including Casino Days, to Betsson AB for EUR 64.5m. Completion was expected in the second or third quarter of 2026. No completion had been announced as at 29 July 2026.
Ownership position checked 29 July 2026.
The three brands, scored on things you can check yourself
| Lucky Days | Spin Away | Casino Days | |
| Sister to Lucky Days | The brand itself | Yes, and the only one | No, and not close |
| Kahnawake number in the footer | Permit 1041 | Permit 1041 | CPA 01054 |
| National licences held | Four registers, two of them European | No European register at all | Four registers, none shared with the pair |
| Getting in | Bank credentials, no form, on two versions | Registration form everywhere | Registration form, local-language support |
| Standing rewards | Daily wheel spin, no wagering | Nothing published | Cashback to 20 per cent, named tiers |
| Money it takes | C$, SEK, EUR, ZAR and more | Ten currencies, no SEK | NOK and EUR sites, plus crypto |
| Own app | Android and iOS | None published | None published |
| The flaw to read first | Five counterparties, and one is weak | Withdrawal ceilings bind the self-excluded | Five months idle costs the balance |
The licensed one, and what the licences buy you
Pages on this topic tend to stop at who owns what. The more useful question about this pair is which of the two a regulator has actually vetted, because that decides how you get in, what you can pay with and who hears you if something goes wrong. Lucky Days is the vetted one, on four separate registers, and the effect turns up in the product rather than in the small print.
The Swedish permission is where competitor pages come apart. Licence 25Si298 runs from 26 June 2025 to 25 June 2030, covers online casino and online betting, and is held by L7 Entertainment Limited under organisation number 502090-4891. A supervision decision dated 24 March 2026, case 26Si451, closed with no further action against the holder. Pages calling that permission expired have grabbed 21Si2429, which is a case reference from 2021 rather than a licence, and treated it as one.
The European licence is the second thing routinely got wrong. MGA/B2C/822/2020, issued on 3 June 2021, belongs to Jungle Media Ltd, company C 79253. It is not L7 Entertainment’s licence. The two companies share a registered address, one page took the address as identity, and the error has been copied outward ever since. If you are checking a claim about this brand against that register, search the holder, not the operator you expected.
Two more registers carry it. Ontario registration OPIG1242643 is printed twice on the .ca pages, and the provincial regulator’s own directory maps the brand to L7 Entertainment Limited. Kahnawake permit 1041 was issued on 27 May 2025 to Monkey 9 Limited, a Cyprus company registered as HE 391776. That permit is also the hardest evidence for the link between the two brands, because Spin Away prints the same number in its own footer.
One licence needs a caveat rather than a tick. Curacao OGL/2024/1675/0903 is held by Raging Rhino N.V. at Cassandraweg 52, and the island’s register currently shows it as assessment in progress, measured against a validity period that lapsed before this pass. The switch to a new licensing regime explains why an entry can look like that, but it is not the same thing as a permission in good standing, and it should not be read as one. There is no UK licence at all; the public register there has nothing under this name.
What that buys, in things you can use
A national licence is what makes bank-credential entry possible, and this brand uses it twice. On the SEK site there is no registration form: BankID identifies you, the deposit opens the account, and play starts. The Finnish-language version works the same way through bank credentials. Neither route exists on the sister brand, because the sister holds neither of the licences those routes depend on.
Two more extras come with the licensed brand and not the other. There is a mobile app for Android and iOS, promoted hardest on the .ca pages, where an app store listing is itself a small piece of vetting. And there is the Rewards Wheel, a daily free spin with zero wagering on what it pays. That is rarer than it sounds: most daily-spin mechanics attach a multiplier and a cap. This one attaches neither.
What is actually on offer once you are in
The welcome is built as a ladder rather than a single lump, and the shape is the same wherever it appears. A first deposit matched in full, a second matched at half, a third matched at a quarter. The free spins are loaded onto the first rung and released in daily batches rather than all at once. Book of Dead is the slot those spins run on across the published offers, which tells you something about who the room is aimed at. The amounts change with the currency and they are set out further down.
The drip on the spins is worth a moment. Ten a day for ten days is not the same product as a hundred at once, even though both print as 100 free spins in a headline. It rewards showing up for a fortnight and it quietly writes off anyone who tries the room twice and moves on, which is most people. Read the headline number as an upper bound that assumes a habit, not as something sitting in the account on day one.
Entry is the other place where this brand behaves differently from most rooms it is listed beside. On the two versions with bank-credential sign-in there is no registration form to complete at all: the bank confirms who you are, the deposit opens the account, and the first spin follows. What the operator publishes about that route is exactly that, no form. It is a genuinely different experience from filling in an address and waiting on a document upload. Everywhere else, and on the sister brand everywhere without exception, the ordinary form is what you get.
Beyond the welcome, the standing reward is the Rewards Wheel. One spin a day, free, and no wagering on what it returns. That last clause is what makes it worth naming, because a daily spin whose winnings carry a thirty-five times multiplier is a marketing device rather than a reward. This one pays out as cash.
What there is not, and this matters for anyone choosing between rooms on loyalty: no formal VIP programme is published anywhere in public. No named tiers, no cashback percentage, no account manager offer. Whatever exists for higher-staking players sits behind a login, and a page that describes a tier structure here is describing something it has not seen.
Payment is fiat only. No cryptocurrency appeared anywhere on the site in this pass, on any version of it. The same is true of the sister brand, whose own terms name ten fiat currencies and no coins at all. That is a straightforward difference from the unrelated brand people keep confusing it with, which does take crypto and says so on three separate versions of its site.
The app is worth a line on its own. Android and iOS builds, promoted on the .ca pages, in a market where two of the three brands here publish nothing of the sort. It is not a wrapper for the mobile site as far as the store listings describe it, and it is the clearest single thing you get here and nowhere else in this comparison.
On the game selection itself, this brand publishes neither a game count nor a studio list, and no live-table figure either, on any version that was read. Numbers we have not seen rendered do not get printed here. If a page tells you the lobby holds a precise number of slots from a precise number of studios, ask where that came from, because the operator is not saying.
Currencies and markets
C$ is priced for players in Ontario and for the rest of Canada, on two different versions of the site with two different counterparties behind them. The age gate is 19 in the province and 18 on the international versions, which is a real difference and not a formality if you fall between the two.
SEK is priced on the .se site, which is the one with no registration form. BankID handles identity, the deposit opens the account, and the published offer is 500 kr with 100 spins on top. This is the only version in the whole comparison where you can be playing without typing an address, and it exists because of the licence rather than in spite of it.
EUR is what the site’s international version prices in, and Ireland and Norway sit among the markets it covers. The package there runs to EUR 1000 with 100 free spins. The first deposit is matched in full to EUR 100, with ten spins a day for ten days on Book of Dead. The second is matched at 50 per cent to EUR 200, the third at 25 per cent to EUR 700. The Finnish-language version sits on the same domain with bank-credential entry and a 200-spin offer instead of a cash match.
ZAR gets a version of its own, complete with a rand jackpot ticker. The package is R15,000 with 100 free spins, split R1,500 on the first deposit, R3,000 on the second and R10,500 on the third. It is the largest headline figure the brand publishes anywhere, and it is the offer the sister brand copies rung for rung.
Germany is refused with a country block this operator serves itself, where the sister brand’s international version loads there instead with the offer stripped out of it. Denmark and Poland reverse that arrangement, because both returned this operator’s own block page on 29 July 2026 while the sister refused the connection at the network edge, before any part of its site was reached. The Netherlands has not been served since enforcement there in 2021, and none of those results tells you what a local register does or does not permit.
How to tell which version you have landed on
Because the counterparty changes with the version you are served, the useful habit is to scroll to the bottom before you deposit rather than after. The footer names the company you are contracting with and the permission it trades under, and the two together tell you everything the marketing does not. Four combinations are in circulation and they are not equal; the section below sets out which one you least want to be on.
The same habit settles the question of what is related to what in about ten seconds. Permit 1041 in a footer means you are looking at one of these two brands. CPA 01054 means you are looking at something else entirely, whatever the page that sent you there claimed. Neither number is hard to find, both are printed by the operators themselves rather than reported by anyone in the middle, and no affiliate table beats reading them.
The flaw worth knowing before you deposit
Five different companies stand behind this one brand, and which of them holds your money depends entirely on which version of the site you were served. That is not unusual for a multi-market operator, but the five are not equivalent, and nobody tells you which one you got. Two of them are Malta companies answering to a European regulator. One is a Cyprus company on a Kahnawake permit. The remaining route, the international version, puts you with Raging Rhino N.V. in Curacao, on a licence the island’s register lists as assessment in progress with the expiry date already behind it. That is also the company the Dutch regulator fined EUR 440,000 in May 2021, for a breach period running from January to July 2020. The fine was not contested, it became irrevocable, it was paid, and the brand withdrew from that market. None of that is hidden, and none of it is on the page you land on. If you are being served the international version, you are contracting with the weakest counterparty in the chain while reading marketing written for the strongest.
Where this leaves you
Which sister sites are worth a second account
If you play here and want somewhere else on the same platform, there is exactly one option and it is Spin Away. It will feel identical, and it will not hand you a second welcome worth the switch unless the currency you want is one of the ten it lists and not one of the ones here. If you want a genuinely different room, look at the brand that is not related: Casino Days runs a published cashback scheme, takes coins as well as cash, and is a different company answering to different regulators. The one thing not worth doing is treating those two as interchangeable because a corporate name overlaps.
Shortest version of all of it: this is the sibling with the paperwork, and the paperwork is what pays for the bank-credential sign-in, the app and the free daily spin. Its sister is the same room with a wider currency list and fewer permissions behind it. The third name people attach to both of them belongs to another company altogether, and the number in the footer settles that in one look.